<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plane Nation &#187; Boeing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planenation.com/tag/boeing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planenation.com</link>
	<description>News about commerical aviation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nice Boeing photos</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/06/boeing/nice-boeing-photos.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/06/boeing/nice-boeing-photos.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/06/boeing/nice-boeing-photos.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some cool Boeing images: Oscar Meyer Boeing LCF Image by Telstar Logistics Found this wonderful little bit of Photoshopping on the Internets today. Creator unknown. Read more about the LCF on the blog: &#34;Boeing&#8217;s 747 LCF: The Ugliest Airplane in the World. Maybe.&#34; Incoming search terms:airbus (1)wienermobile (1)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Some cool Boeing images:</p>
<p><strong>Oscar Meyer Boeing LCF</strong><br />
<img alt="Boeing" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/153/350752730_9507184445.jpg" width="400"/><br />
<i>Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49502995517@N01/350752730">Telstar Logistics</a></i><br />
Found this wonderful little bit of Photoshopping on the Internets today. Creator unknown.  </p>
<p>Read more about the LCF on the blog: </p>
<p><a href="http://telstarlogistics.typepad.com/telstarlogistics/2007/01/boeings_lcf_the.html">&quot;Boeing&#8217;s 747 LCF: The Ugliest Airplane in the World. Maybe.&quot;</a></p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Nice Boeing photos" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/06/boeing/nice-boeing-photos.htm"></script><h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li>airbus (1)</li><li>wienermobile (1)</li></ul><!-- SEO SearchTerms Tagging 2 plugin took 3.279 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/06/boeing/nice-boeing-photos.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boeing forecasts 7200 new airplanes for North America over the next 20 years</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/04/boeing/boeing-forecasts-7200-new-airplanes-for-north-america-over-the-next-20-years.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/04/boeing/boeing-forecasts-7200-new-airplanes-for-north-america-over-the-next-20-years.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing forecasts that air carriers in North America will take delivery of about 7,200 new airplanes over the next 20 years at an investment of $700 billion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p></p>
<p>Boeing forecasts that air carriers in North America will take delivery of about 7,200 new airplanes over the next 20 years at an investment of $700 billion.</p>
<p>New airplane deliveries in Canada and the United States will be driven largely by the need to retire older, less fuel-efficient single-aisle airplanes and regional jets, as airlines replace them with new-generation, more fuel-efficient models. For the Boeing forecast, the North America market consists of the U.S. and Canada. Mexico is included in Boeing&#8217;s forecast for Latin America.</p>
<p>&#8220;North America is a large, mature market, and we expect passenger traffic for the region to grow at a modest rate of 3.4%,&#8221; said Randy Tinseth, vice president of Marketing, Boeing Commercial Airplanes. &#8220;The fast-paced lifestyles in Canada and the U.S. require rapid, frequent and reliable coast-to-coast and interregional transportation. Driven by this demand, nearly three-quarters of the new deliveries over the next 20 years will be single-aisle airplanes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Taking retirement of airplanes into account, the North America fleet will grow from 6,590 airplanes today to about 9,000 airplanes by 2029.</p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Boeing forecasts 7200 new airplanes for North America over the next 20 years" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/04/boeing/boeing-forecasts-7200-new-airplanes-for-north-america-over-the-next-20-years.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/04/boeing/boeing-forecasts-7200-new-airplanes-for-north-america-over-the-next-20-years.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boeing testing Dreamliner 787 in Iceland for crosswind landings</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/03/boeing/boeing-testing-dreamliner-787-in-iceland-for-crosswind-landings.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/03/boeing/boeing-testing-dreamliner-787-in-iceland-for-crosswind-landings.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[787]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Dreamliner, Boeing 787, landed at Keflavík International Airport on September 1st in the  morning for test flights in side wind. According to the airport’s information officer Fridthór Eydal, the airplane will be in Iceland for test flights for about a week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The new Dreamliner, Boeing 787, landed at Keflavík International Airport on September 1st in the  morning for test flights in side wind. According to the airport’s information officer Fridthór Eydal, the airplane will be in Iceland for test flights for about a week.</p>
</p>
<p>Keflavík Airport is known for strong winds. Runways extend in all directions, so it is possible to conduct test landings in side wind no matter which direction the wind blows, Morgunbladid reports.</p>
<p>The flight to Iceland was the Dreamliner’s first real test flight outside the US. In December a Dreamliner airplane was supposed to be tested in Iceland in side winds but it wasn’t windy enough and so testing took place in Roswell, New Mexico.</p>
<p>Both Boeing and Airbus have used Keflavík Airport for testing before, including Boeing 777 and Airbus A380.</p>
<p><strong>Airbus A380 Testing</strong>﻿</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lP4vOl-I5pE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lP4vOl-I5pE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Boeing testing Dreamliner 787 in Iceland for crosswind landings" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/03/boeing/boeing-testing-dreamliner-787-in-iceland-for-crosswind-landings.htm"></script><h4>Incoming search terms:</h4><ul><li>787 crosswind landings (2)</li><li>787 iceland (1)</li><li>787 in iceland (1)</li><li>boeing 787 crosswind landing iceland (1)</li><li>boeing 787 keflavik (1)</li><li>dreamliner iceland (1)</li><li>Keflavik Airport 787 (1)</li><li>test dreamliner iceland (1)</li></ul><!-- SEO SearchTerms Tagging 2 plugin took 1.029 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/09/03/boeing/boeing-testing-dreamliner-787-in-iceland-for-crosswind-landings.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boeing delays Dreamliner 787 again</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/27/boeing/boeing-delays-dreamliner-787-again.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/27/boeing/boeing-delays-dreamliner-787-again.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[787]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing has delayed the delivery of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner once more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Boeing has delayed the delivery of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner once more.  Boeing  said today that it now expects delivery of the first 787 in the middle of the first quarter 2011.</p>
<p>The delivery date revision follows an assessment of the availability of an engine needed for the final phases of flight test this fall. </p>
<p>While Boeing works closely with Rolls-Royce to expedite engine availability, flight testing across the test fleet continues as planned.</p>
<p>Boeing said last month that the cumulative impact of a series of issues, including supplier workmanship issues related to the horizontal stabilizer and instrumentation delays, could push first delivery of the 787 a few weeks into 2011. The delay in engine availability has extended that estimate to mid-first quarter 2011.</p>
<p> </p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Boeing delays Dreamliner 787 again" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/27/boeing/boeing-delays-dreamliner-787-again.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/27/boeing/boeing-delays-dreamliner-787-again.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workmanship and design Issues may delay the first delivery of the Boeing 747-8</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/14/boeing/workmanship-and-design-issues-may-delay-the-first-delivery-of-the-boeing-747-8.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/14/boeing/workmanship-and-design-issues-may-delay-the-first-delivery-of-the-boeing-747-8.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 06:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[747-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citing “a couple of workmanship issues, and a design issue or two,” Boeing CEO Jim McNerney planted another seed of doubt about the company's chances of delivering the first 747-8 before year-end. In fact, McNerney said the 787 Dreamliner-from which Boeing has already exhausted most of its schedule margin for delivery this year-stood a better chance of meeting its 2010 delivery goal than did the 747-8. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p></p>
<p class="bodytext">﻿Citing “a couple of workmanship issues, and a design issue or two,” Boeing CEO Jim McNerney planted another seed of doubt about the company&#8217;s chances of delivering the first 747-8 before year-end. In fact, McNerney said the 787 Dreamliner-from which Boeing has already exhausted most of its schedule margin for delivery this year-stood a better chance of meeting its 2010 delivery goal than did the 747-8.</p>
<p class="bodytext">“I would characterize both as normal flight-test programs in the sense that there&#8217;s no major reconfiguration that&#8217;s been driven by discoveries as we&#8217;ve gone through them,” said McNerney during the company&#8217;s second-quarter earnings call. “With that said, I think the extent to which there&#8217;s some risk to the schedule on the 787, I would characterize that as more [about] getting through lower-risk certification [tasks]-turn-times on telemetry, certification documentation. If you forced me to compare it, I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s a little more risk on the 747-8.”</p>
<p class="bodytext">﻿McNerney referred, he acknowledged the need for design changes, such as the “aerodynamic tweaks” to the main landing gear doors to address buffeting created by a 30-deg flap setting on landing.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> </p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Workmanship and design Issues may delay the first delivery of the Boeing 747-8" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/14/boeing/workmanship-and-design-issues-may-delay-the-first-delivery-of-the-boeing-747-8.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/14/boeing/workmanship-and-design-issues-may-delay-the-first-delivery-of-the-boeing-747-8.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAA orders Boeing 747 fixes</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/10/boeing/faa-orders-boeing-747-fixes.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/10/boeing/faa-orders-boeing-747-fixes.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[747-400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerned about potentially hazardous takeoff problems affecting the Boeing 747-400, U.S. air-safety regulators have proposed mandatory fixes to ensure the jumbo jets will climb properly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p></p>
<p>﻿Concerned about potentially hazardous takeoff problems affecting the Boeing 747-400, U.S. air-safety regulators have proposed mandatory fixes to ensure the jumbo jets will climb properly.</p>
<p>The FAA is acting after flaps on a 747-400 with Rolls Royce engines automatically retracted during takeoff, it said in an Aug. 5 Federal Register notice. A faulty signal from the engine’s control unit led to the retraction, which can impair a plane’s ability to take off, the agency said.</p>
</p>
<p>The proposed order would cover 98 U.S. aircraft and cost airlines about $85 per plane, the agency said in the notice. Boeing on Jan. 12 recommended modifying the 747-400 aircraft with engines made by  GE<a class="web_ticker" title="Get Quote" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=GE:US">.</a> and  Pratt &amp; Whitney, which use the same signal design as the Rolls-Royce models, the FAA said.</p>
<p>The agency said the unsafe condition may result in “reduced climb performance” and cause a “collision with terrain and obstacles or forced landing of the airplane.”</p>
<p>The modification, described as not a “significant regulatory action,” will cost about $8,330 for the industry, the agency said.</p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="FAA orders Boeing 747 fixes" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/10/boeing/faa-orders-boeing-747-fixes.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/08/10/boeing/faa-orders-boeing-747-fixes.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delivery of Boeing 787 Dreamliner pushed to early 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/07/15/boeing/delivery-of-boeing-787-dreamliner-pushed-to-early-2011.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/07/15/boeing/delivery-of-boeing-787-dreamliner-pushed-to-early-2011.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[787]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first delivery of Boeing's new 787 jetliner may slip into early 2011 because of inspections and instrument changes on the flight test aircraft, the head of the program said Thursday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The first delivery of Boeing&#8217;s new 787 jetliner may slip into early 2011 because of inspections and instrument changes on the flight test aircraft, the head of the program said Thursday.</p>
<p>Scott Fancher, general manager of the program for Boeing Commercial Airliners, told reporters in a teleconference that Boeing still intends to deliver its first 787 to Japan&#8217;s ANA by the end of the year. He said that &#8220;as a cautionary note,&#8221; Boeing is warning that the delivery might be extended a few weeks into 2011.</p>
<p>If so, it would be another in a long series of delays on the 787 program, many due to problems with components built by suppliers around the globe that ship huge sections of the plane to be assembled at Boeing&#8217;s Everett, Washington, plant. Boeing, which has orders for 863 of the twin-aisle jets, originally planned to deliver the first 787 in 2008.﻿</p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Delivery of Boeing 787 Dreamliner pushed to early 2011" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/07/15/boeing/delivery-of-boeing-787-dreamliner-pushed-to-early-2011.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/07/15/boeing/delivery-of-boeing-787-dreamliner-pushed-to-early-2011.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boeing&#8217;s first 787 Dreamliner with GEnx engines takes off</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/16/boeing/boeings-first-787-dreamliner-with-genx-engines-takes-off.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/16/boeing/boeings-first-787-dreamliner-with-genx-engines-takes-off.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[787]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing's first 787 Dreamliner with GEnx engines takes off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Boeing&#8217;s fifth flight-test  787 Dreamliner and  the first with GEnx-1B engines  took off on its first flight from Everett&#8217;s Paine Field at 2:40 p.m. on June 16th.</p>
<p>Currently despite the 787 Dreamliner delays, the engines are not yet quite at its fuel-burn specifications.   The engines are currently about 2% off specifications.</p>
<p>A planned improvement package next year will bring the engines very close to specs and then we have a second package coming on (in 2012) and we will bring the engines above speck.</p>
<p><img style="float: left;" title="boeing-787-dreamliner-with-genx-engines.jpg" src="http://www.planenation.com/wp-content/uploads/boeing-787-dreamliner-with-genx-engines.jpg" border="0" alt="Boeing's first 787 Dreamliner with GEnx engines takes off" width="465" height="254" /></p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Boeing's first 787 Dreamliner with GEnx engines takes off" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/16/boeing/boeings-first-787-dreamliner-with-genx-engines-takes-off.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/16/boeing/boeings-first-787-dreamliner-with-genx-engines-takes-off.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we need the Boeing 747-8F freighter?</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/09/boeing/do-we-need-the-boeing-747-8f-freighter.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/09/boeing/do-we-need-the-boeing-747-8f-freighter.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[747-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boeing 747-8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  With the bankruptcy filing by Japan Airlines and the announcement that  the airline is retiring its fleet of 35 747 passenger aircraft (27 -400s &#38; 8 -400D) . Currently, of the 1418 747s built and delivered since 1970, the worldwide active fleet of 747s stands at 810, this includes military and governmental VIP customers as well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> </p>
<div>With the bankruptcy filing by Japan Airlines and the announcement that  the airline is retiring its fleet of 35 747 passenger aircraft (27 -400s &amp; 8 -400D) .</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>Currently, of the 1418 747s built and delivered since 1970, the worldwide active fleet of 747s stands at 810, this includes military and governmental VIP customers as well, compared to the 633 active -400s.</div>
<div></div>
<div>However, as a result of the economic downturn and a progressive retirement of older 747s, 56 -400s of all types are parked, nearly 1 out of every 10 747-400 built.</div>
<div></div>
<div>By 2013, Air New Zealand, Air India,  will no longer fly passenger 747s, all opting to replace their models with smaller 777s or larger A380s. With the coming retirement of the 37 JAL -400s, the number of parked -400 aircraft will more than double when combined with other airlines&#8217; future fleet plans.</div>
<div></div>
<div>With surplus 747-400s available, the result will be to hasten a steady and precipitous drop in purchase and lease rates for -400s. The introduction of the new -8F and -8F will only serve to drive those prices lower and lower. There are two ways to look at this:</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>OPPORTUNITY</strong></div>
<div>The retirement of older 747-400s means that less efficient large aircraft will be replaced with equally large or larger more efficient aircraft meaning future competitions for Airbus and Boeing to sell the A380 or 747-8I, respectively. Boeing vice president of marketing, Randy Tinseth, said at the Dubai Air Show &#8220;ultimately we believe that market is going to pick up when airlines&#8230;this coming cycle&#8230;start to replace their older 747s.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>CHALLENGE</strong></div>
<div>However, with 747-400 values dropping, the incentive to purchase a new 747-8F drops (where Boeing believes the market is) making it potentially cheaper to convert passenger -400s to freighters even if they are less efficient. Steve Rimmer, chief executive for Guggenheim Aviation Partners, which recently canceled two of four 747-8Fs on order, said in October that &#8220;we&#8217;ve never seen this quantity of freighters before in the desert&#8221; and added that &#8220;this time we won&#8217;t see the market pick up fast because there&#8217;s a lot of good quality aircraft in the desert&#8221;.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong><em>Too many aircraft?</em></strong></div>
<div>While a difficult point to concede for this aviation geek, there are perhaps too many aircraft in the world. I would add that this point extends to narrow-body aircraft (which are also dropping in value) also. Boeing and Airbus responded to staggering demand for aircraft big and small hiking production to potentially unsustainable rates. As a long term business the immediate benefits of hiking production are weighed against long term impacts (positive and negative) on future sales.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2010/01/trend-spotting-what-jals-bankr.html">More here&#8230;</a></div>
<p> </p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Do we need the Boeing 747-8F freighter?" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/09/boeing/do-we-need-the-boeing-747-8f-freighter.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/06/09/boeing/do-we-need-the-boeing-747-8f-freighter.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next generation 737 may not get composite fuselage</title>
		<link>http://www.planenation.com/2010/05/30/boeing/next-generation-737-may-not-get-composite-fuselage.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.planenation.com/2010/05/30/boeing/next-generation-737-may-not-get-composite-fuselage.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Braniff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[737]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planenation.com/?p=510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been well known and well communicated that composites for use in primary fuselage structures scale up better than they do in the opposite direction. Therefore it comes as little surprise that any potential 737 replacement, whether launched this year or later may not get the same monolithic composite fuselage employed on the 787. “We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><div>It’s been well known and well communicated that composites for use in primary fuselage structures scale up better than they do in the opposite direction. Therefore it comes as little surprise that any potential 737 replacement, whether launched this year or later may not get the same monolithic composite fuselage employed on the 787.</div>
<div>“<em>We can’t scale down proportionately because the thinner skin would be susceptible to hail damage,</em>” said Frank Doerner, materials VP at Boeing&#8217;s research and technology group.</div>
<div>Perhaps it is with this in mind that Airbus has warned about the dangers of going toward a clean sheet design when new materials for narrowbodied airplanes has not yet matured enough – there’s good merit to this although where that would leave Boeing in terms of a potential new 737 replacement is not clear.</div>
<div>What is clear though is that the 787 and A350XWB have brought so much new technology and materials expertise that the subsequent second generation of widebodies will be driven by extensive composite knowledge.</div>
<div>As Airbus looks to launch the re-engined A320 by the end of the year, the comments by Doerner dampen the prospects many hold on an all new 737 emerging before the decade is out. If that is the case, then it is more likely than not that Boeing will stick to the singular CFM International LEAP-X engine to provide commonality with existing CFM-powered 737s.﻿</div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://www.glgroup.com/News/Potential-Boeing-737-Replacement-May-Not-Get-Composite-Fuselage-48645.html">More here&#8230;</a></div>
<div></div></p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://onlywire.com/btn/button_42304" title="Next generation 737 may not get composite fuselage" url="http://www.planenation.com/2010/05/30/boeing/next-generation-737-may-not-get-composite-fuselage.htm"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planenation.com/2010/05/30/boeing/next-generation-737-may-not-get-composite-fuselage.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
